Last Word: Z is for Zero Waste, Zero Emissions, ZSL & ZERI

Last Word: Z is for Zero Waste, Zero Emissions, ZSL & ZERI

Z is for Zero Emissions and Zero Waste. We hear about the work of the Zero Emissions organisation in Australia, the globalZero Waste Alliance and Singapore’s online Zero Wastenetwork. It is also for the Zoological Society of London and the wonderful work ZSL has been doing to recycle nylon fishing nets in the Philippines for Interface to make into carpet tiles, as well as produce the Sustainable Palm Oil Transparency Toolkit (SPOTT). Twenty years ago (April 6, 1994), Gunter Pauli helped create a think tank in Japan to produce a competitive business model in a world guided by the Kyoto Protocol.  ZERI was the result, promoting the philosophy of zero emissions, where waste is converted to revenues, cascading into a chain of value generation. And now there’s a wonderful group of people in Indonesia who are committed to the Gunter Pauli philosophy and have started the Indonesia Initiative of Sustainability Blue - more to come in 2015. Environmental Leader also reported on Zero Waste strategies, creating new revenue streams for companies around the world. Read More

Zero Waste Strategies Create New Revenue Streams

Environmental Leader reported (7 May 2014):

Waste Management

The production, use, and after use of consumer and commercial products creates solid waste that represents both a waste of resources and a source of environmental impact – but also a revenue opportunity.

Companies Commit to Zero Waste

American industrial facilities generate and dispose of approximately 7.6 billion tons of industrial solid waste each year, according to the EPA.

Many manufacturing companies have begun to focus on reducing the amount of solid waste they generate; some of these are committing to sending zero waste to landfill in coming years.

Procter & Gamble (P&G) has committed to send zero manufacturing waste to landfill by 2020. The company defines “zero waste” as “zero manufacturing waste disposed directly to landfill or to incineration without energy recovery by the site, except where local legal requirements specify that regulated wastes must be disposed in a landfill.”

Tactics the company is using to reach this goal include working to eliminate or reduce solid waste from production processes, designing more material-efficient delivery systems, and using lifecycle thinking to improve product packaging and design.

Currently, P&G has more than 60 manufacturing sites that send zero manufacturing waste to landfill.

“You save money each time you reduce waste going to landfill,” says Len Sauers, vice president of global sustainability for P&G. “This has led to significant cost savings in our supply chain, which helps the bottom line.”

Hershey’s is another company with a zero waste to landfill program, diverting materials that would typically end up in landfills to alternate channels, such as recycling, reuse or incineration. By the end of 2013, six Hershey manufacturing facilities had reached zero waste, the company said.

Nestlé has made a pledge that all 150 of its European factories will be zero waste by 2020. The company achieved its first zero waste facility in 2011. By the end of 2012, Nestlé had achieved zero waste status in 39 of its 468 factories worldwide.

Aircraft engines manufacturer Pratt & Whitney says it will achieve zero waste – 100 percent recycled – in its factories by 2025. The company says that, since 2006, it has reduced its total industrial process waste by 30 percent.

General Motors is striving toward achieving zero waste in its facilities, but is also attempting to drive a global movement toward zero waste (a project which won a 2014 Environmental Leader Top Project of the Year Award). GM now recycles 90 percent of its global manufacturing waste and has committed to increase its landfill-free facilities to 125 by 2020. The company uses a range of processes, including data collection and monitoring systems, employee and external engagement initiatives, and creative reuse and recycling. A large part of its global movement toward zero waste is sharing these strategies throughout its value chain and the broader manufacturing industry.

Bridgestone Americas’ Wilson, NC, passenger and light truck tire manufacturing plant has achieved Underwriters Laboratories’ (UL) landfill waste diversion claim validation for zero waste to landfill. Zero waste to landfill is the highest claim validation UL gives for landfill waste diversion, which is performed and delivered by UL Environment, a business unit of UL. Bridgestone’s Wilson tire plant was the first facility of any kind to receive this designation.

 

Waste as an Asset

 

In addition to putting programs into place to reduce waste, smart companies are identifying ways to repurpose waste into useful raw materials.

 

In its drive for global zero waste, GM has a philosophy of “thinking of waste as a resource out of place and turning waste streams into revenue streams,” the company says.

 

P&G embraces a similar philosophy with its Waste to Worth program. A ‘Global Asset Recovery Purchases’ (GARP) team is charged with finding external partners who can turn waste and non-performing inventory into something useful. The company says that, over the last five years, Waste to Worth has created over a billion dollars in value for P&G.

 

For example:

 

Waste from P&G’s Charmin plant in Mexico is now used to make roof tiles for the local community.

Diaper scraps from a US Pampers site are converted into upholstery filling.

Waste from Gillette shaving foam in a UK facility is composted and turned into turf for commercial use.

P&G evaluates waste reduction pilot opportunities in both developed and developing regions. The Waste to Worth team conducted a study in the Philippines, with the cooperation of government stakeholders, to understand the composition of the waste stream, including the percent that is biodegradable, recyclable, and residual. The data led to the design of a business model that extracts value from the waste stream. The company is partnering with the Asian Development Bank with the goal of piloting the business model in Antipolo, Philippines, and hopes to one day expand this model to other parts of the world.

Jones Lang LaSalle finds revenue from waste by selling used IT equipment on MarkITx.

This helps Jones Lang LaSalle and its clients to reduce e-waste and offset the cost of new IT infrastructure by listing depreciated or obsolete equipment on the exchange and recouping the maximum value.

Other Benefits of a Zero Waste Strategy

Zero waste strategies help companies build their brand, reduce cost, and manage risk, says Tom Carpenter, director of growth and development for Waste Management Sustainability Services.

Strategies for reducing waste also encourage a focus on innovation, he says. “Overall improvements in the working environment also give rise to more engaged employees. In turn, increased employee engagement can result in improved worker productivity and lower turnover.”

Carpenter offers a concise ‘roadmap’ to zero waste. Tactics include gaining senior leadership buy-in, engaging employees, setting a goal, gathering data and developing metrics, and obtaining supplier commitment.

Smart companies find that revenue opportunities, brand building, and risk management are important parts of waste strategies. It’s one strategy among many that is “how you build a business,” says Sauers.

Source: http://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/05/07/zero-waste-strategies-create-new-revenue-streams/

 

Leave a Reply