Is there finally a viable means for CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) to be put into practice economically and safely? Even though the capture of CO2 and storing it in underground geological formations is seen as a way of mitigating climate change, it is still in its nascent stage, where current technologies are deemed too expensive or unreliable. Researchers at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory claim to have found the answer to these problems with their new absorber and are in the process of refining it for commercial uses. Read more

New material boost for carbon capture

By Chris Wickham for Reuters (24 September 2012):

Carbon capture has not yet been proven on a commercial scale

Researchers have created a new material that could solve some of the problems currently plaguing carbon capture and storage.

The material, made from aluminium nitrate salt, cheap organic materials and water, is non-toxic and requires less energy to strip out the carbon when it becomes saturated, according to the scientists who author a paper appearing today in Nature Chemistry.

Carbon capture has not yet been proven on a commercial scale and pilot projects have been hindered by concerns that the ammonia-based materials, or amines, used to absorb carbon can themselves produce toxic emissions.

They are also expensive and need large amounts of heat to boil out the carbon so it can be taken away and stored.

The researchers say their new absorber, dubbed NOTT-300, could overcome all these problems.

“I feel this can been viewed as a revolution to a certain degree,” says Sihai Yang from the University of Nottingham , who worked on the project.

“It is non-toxic, and zero heating input is required for the regeneration. There is promising potential to overcome the traditional amine material on both environmental and economic grounds.”

Dr Timmy Ramirez-Cuesta, who worked on the project at the ISIS research centre at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxfordshire, says the new material could simplify carbon capture by using interchangeable filters.

“When the material is saturated, the exhaust gases are diverted to the second container where the process continues,” he says.”The full container is disconnected from the system and the CO2 is removed using a vacuum and collected. The regenerated container can then be reconnected and used repeatedly.”

The team, which also included scientists from the University of Oxford and Peking University in China, say the new material captured close to 100 per cent of the carbon dioxide in experiments using a cocktail of gases.

Although the rate could be lower in the “dynamic conditions” of a real power station, it should still be over 90 per cent, which is a key test for the viability of an absorber.

The material can pick up harmful gases, including sulphur dioxide, in a mixture, allowing others like hydrogen, methane, nitrogen and oxygen to pass through.

It does, however, absorb water vapour and the researchers are doing further work to overcome the problem, which could reduce its performance with CO2.

Professor Martin Schroeder at the University of Nottingham, who led the research, says NOTT-300 could also be put to use in gas purification. Natural gas often contains 10 per cent of carbon dioxide impurity which needs to be removed before it can be used.

The scientists say they are working with companies in the carbon capture business on commercialising the new material.

Source: www.abc.net.au